Residential Design | Real people don't hire architects...?

Archive for the ‘Residential Design’ Category

Accidentally Modern

January 19, 2018

Fun opportunity to add color!

These are real and work too keep out sun and weather.

Difficult to say how important these are for protection from the elements but at least they are real and work.

These shutters are a design elements, act as awnings, and keep out the weather. Triple duty!

A while ago I wrote a post called “De-shuttering Our World.” I’m afraid it was not completely flattering to the application of most shutters, my biggest complaint(s) being that most are ill used, and don’t actually work.

All of the shutters in this post, on the other hand, actually work and serve, often multiple, and very real purposes. This may qualify them for my definition of classic, which brings me to the last photo on the bottom and the reason for this post, which is to inquire, “about what shutters have to do with classic design?” The answer: a lot when they work!

Does this mean that classic design is a product of function? Well yes I suppose it does. Certainly if one scours the architecture history books long treatises moralizing on the subject will quickly appear. Likewise function is seen as the classical root of many products, cars, software, even business systems. It would appear that form follows function is a classical standard. One that nicely applies to the little manufactured home in the bottom image.

The need to justify having thus been satisfied, I am now allowed to say that I picked the place because I like it. If I were looking for a sunny place to hang my hat I would take it in a heartbeat.

Classic manufactured home. I had to draw a picture because the photos of the house were copyrighted. Follow the link to see how it actually looks.

Why? It is all about function, i.e., metal siding, hurricane shutters, carport, porch enclosure, and fence, all are there for a reason, even its overall size and roof angle has clearly been designed to fit on the back of a delivery truck.

Nothing more is included. The construction materials look, manufactured, otherwise it is without decoration. Only the skirt around the base of the building, because of its color, hints at a bit of amplification. The house is austere, un-contrived, accidentally modern and therefore pretty special.

Posted in Architectural Criticism, Architecture, Design, Hire an architect., Residential Design | Tagged manufactured homes, mobile homes, modern architecture, timeless standards, vernacular architecture | Leave a Comment »

The feel good factor of unbridled color.

October 10, 2017

Save

Basic town house found in any town USA

Better than a tiny house? – This is the face of many pseudo urban commuter suburbs in the US. Not such bad places really, especially if one seeks the untroubled reverie of commonality, the refuge of normalcy in uncertain times. By many standards the place is actually a pillar of luxury. Who, with jobs, kids, grandkids, and stuff, could argue with 3 bedrooms, 3 bathrooms, a big kitchen, actual dining room, “whatever” room, off street parking and a security system too. Why then, in the face of such naked functionality, does this place leave some of us feeling mildly depressed? I don’t think that I really want to know why, or more likely want to face it.

Admitting that color feels good! Rather than subject the reader to more dreary investigations, I thought it would be a lot more fun to look at what makes many of us feel good! That, of course, would be bold, bright, primary, unapologetic color.

Colorful historic downtown mixed use.

Save

Colorful townhouses.

Advocating for reinstatement. I often wonder why we have removed it from our visual life, demoted it to a position of the unsophisticated, even crass. I for one would like to see it reinstated. I wonder what the home owners association would say if the home owner in the photo above were to apply for approval to repaint the house as per below? Approval or not, it definitely makes me feel a lot better about the house.

Defying the HOA

Save

Posted in Architectural Criticism, Architecture, Culture, Design, Hire an architect., Residential Design | Tagged architectural colors, architectural theory, curb appeal, design ideas, home owners, property values, vernacular architecture | Leave a Comment »

Making a Case for Anomalies

July 18, 2017

Holy Cow! This looks a like the concept house in the header, begging the question; “do I own it or change it?”

Artistic Logic – Where do I start with this one? The temptation is to say what makes a home owner do things like this, until I think, “maybe the homeowner didn’t do it.” Maybe it was a builder? Probably not. Those guys are all about conformity and resale value. What/wherever the idea came from doesn’t matter. I looks pretty strange to most of us. Yet, I hesitate to criticize, because I somehow find artistic logic in what was done. Honestly, I see things like this in modern art museums all the time. There has been a kind of purists pursuit of geometry while totally ignoring everything else. The effect is humorous. It makes me smile which is not such a bad thing for a house to do.

Typical Vernacular House.

Vernacular Building – It also points to another interesting question. Is the split level house a form of “new” vernacular? What does that word mean? Wikipedia says it is “an architectural style that is designed based on local needs, availability of construction materials and reflecting local traditions..,” without the use of “…formally-schooled architects.” There are text books written on the subject, but I like this definition. It sums up how I think about vernacular building (notice that I did not call it architecture, but that is a subject for another day). The definition almost, but not quite, fits the split level place. There is a utilitarian and historical implication associated with vernacular buildings that often manifest as a foundation for some future style, or expression of a recognizable over riding unity. The split level house meets the utilitarian criteria but hardy the historical one. The log cabin meets them both.

Noteworthy? – Psychologist define many different ways of learning. I suppose that perception is particular to each individual and that mine is visual. Often, I see something noteworthy without any idea why. Only after some time and conscious analysis does the meaning reveal itself. For me the split level house is like that. It sent a message that read; ” I may be an anomaly but I am also an individual who is unconscious of, and therefore uninfluenced by, architectural and stylistic mores.” The message is totally unsophisticated. It redefines how we think about building and points toward a fresh approach to design, the pursuit of which being the reason for this this blog.

Save

Posted in Architectural Criticism, Architecture, Art, Culture, Design, Hire an architect., Residential Design | Tagged architectural anomolies, architectural theory, curb appeal, design ideas, home owners, new architecture, primitive hut, timeless standards, vernacular architecture | 2 Comments »

Simple Architecture: a place for the eye to rest?

May 10, 2017

Hi Hugh! This Hugh Newell Jacobsen.

Hugh Newell Jacobsen

is a semi famous, and as it happens, local architect; the kind that mostly architecture students and the “arts and croissants” crowd know about. As first year architecture students, way back in the 1990’s, we were once given the name of an important “architectural luminary” and told to copy his style. I remember having thought that I lucked out because I got Frank Lloyd Wright. My friend, on the other hand, got Hugh. Now I think that he was the lucky one.

If you look up Hugh Newell Jacobsen, Wikipedia will tell you that his architecture is simple. If you then decide to do a search on the term “simple architecture” you will find all manner of modern, very un-simple houses. You may even ask yourself, “what is simple? Is it definable?”

This is the house that Hugh built. Sorry you need to google him for images. I couldn’t find any that were labeled for reuse, so a drew a picture.

Good Question

One I will explore a bit here. The most important thing to know about simple architecture is that the architect is a decision maker, and I didn’t read this anywhere. I just know it. Architecture, like language is semiotic. Think of it as “logo-centric,” meaning just about every person who has ever lived in a house has some notion of how one should/does look. If there are 248 million adults living in the US, then it follows that an equal number of mirages make up the collective dictionary of residential architecture. Likewise, if you think of them as words, then it is not too difficult to see that Jacobsen decided to use only vowels to write his. He ended up with “Snoopy’s Dog House.” Of course, the decision forced him to use every sophisticated architectural trick in the book, i.e. scale, proportion, repetition, texture…, to design an ethereal dog house, simple to recognize, not simple to achieve.

Common Simplicity

Is it possible to find simplicity in our real low budget, often crowded, every day world? Is it possible to make these places ethereal? Us everyday, “non luminary” architects ask ourselves these questions all the time.

Take a look at these houses. What would it take to make them “ethereal?” Can a 3′ ribbon of grass fit between the raw yard and the house? Can the roof vents be moved to the back where they don’t show? Can the window frame be made to disappear into the building? Can the stair landing become a low deck extending the full width of the house? Can the railing become a panel type element to match the house? Can the siding be made from something besides vinyl?

The answer of course is yes to all. Do these changes make the places “ethereal?” Probably not. Maybe though, in today’s complex built environment, common simplicity is not a bad place for the eye to rest.

Save

Posted in Architectural Criticism, Architecture, Art, Culture, Design, Hire an architect., Residential Design | Tagged architectural theory, simple architecture, timeless standards, vernacular architecture | Leave a Comment »

“… three, two, one, lift off house.”

February 27, 2017

Authors note: Original article is written for and posted in Aspire Design and Home. You might want to check them out, or just read it here.

house rocket

Rocket Launch – Since I am already on the subject of houses on hilltops, I might as well take a look at this one. Something strange happens to ones perception of space when approaching a tall house, up a hill, with pointy gables. It starts to feel like one is approaching a rocket launch. The flat facade of the building adds to the effect because there is no intervening element to catch the viewers attention and stop the upward motion. This is reinforced by the driveway wall which also points, behaving like a one point perspective, drawing the viewer’s eye toward some infinite point on the horizon.

Single Visual Element – A bit of academic analysis clearly gives us to understand that, from a design standpoint, the house in the photo really starts at the street. It is one with the driveway; a single visual element, dominated by an extremely strong profile, defined by vertical lines which terminate in arrows pointing skyward. Have you ever driven through a farm town and seen the silos next to a railway? The only thing missing from the photo of the house under consideration is the train.

Transformation by Decoration – Also worth considering is that rows of tall flat facades, springing directly up from sidewalks, show up in residential buildings in places like Paris, Vienna and New York. These buildings are transformed, by dint of decoration. Variations in the size, placement and celebration of openings, add complexity to the extent that one barely realizes they are tall, which begins to suggest that height might be something to cultivate rather than disdain, as I was at first inclined to do.

Why so Awkward – Likewise I am led to ask, if not the height, then why so awkward. The answer, of course, is that on some level most of us understand that the unity of form and purpose evident in the row house, the silo, and even the rocket is missing in the suburban residence. We end up with what I call a “fusion tract house,” sporting a garage door, a couple of gables, and the arched part of a “Palladian” window, all forced into a shape that does not suit.

Architectural Form – If this home owner were my client I would, without going too far into value judgements, simply ask if this tall silhouette is one that he/she would choose to put in a typical suburban neighborhood in “any-town” USA. If the answer was yes, then I would advise that the homeowner embrace the concept by loosing the “home depot” doors, windows, and finishes in favor of a stark functional version, organized to reinforce the architecture. If, on the other hand, the answer was “not so much,” I would recommend either a different site or a different architectural form.

Bridget Gaddis, is a Licensed Architect and LEED Accredited Professionnal practicing nationally, and locally in the Washington DC area. She holds professional degrees in both Architecture and Interior Design and has a comprehensive background in commercial retail design, planning and construction. She has many years experience working for well known architects, developers and retailers. In 2011 she started Gaddis Architect an independent practice in Alexandria, VA. In addition, Ms. Gaddis has an interest in residential projects and is the author of “Real People Don’t Hire Architects,” a blog about houses.

Save

Posted in Architectural Criticism, Architecture, Culture, Design, Hire an architect., Residential Design | Tagged architectural theory, builder house, cartoon, colonial houses, curb appeal, design ideas, fusion tract house, home owners | Leave a Comment »

The seen can also see.

February 13, 2017

Land for Sale

House for Sale

Which is better, house or the hilltop?

Strip Mine

German Castle

Anyone who has driven down an interstate through a hilly or mountainous area in the US has seen these places. I often wonder what piece of psychology makes a home owner want to live on top of a mountain enough to cut off said mountain top?

Strip mining for example – I think I just compared a house to a strip mine – is understandable. Miners must cut off the mountain to get the coal, which makes them a lot of money. It is what they value. Big box retailers like Walmart do this too, which is also understandable. They want to be seen from the freeway. It brings them more customers.

Historically, people went to considerable trouble to build on promontories as an act of defense, because the locations were hard to attack. They were very visible, and of course, the seen can also see. Which may be key to my question. Maybe the mountain top home owner likes the view. For a second this is believable, certainly it is what he or she would tell anyone inclined to listen. Then one realizes that the little house half way down the hillside most likely has an equally breathtaking view, until a “Pile-A-House” was plunked into the main site line, that is!

Romantically – Has the mountain top home owner romanticized the historic castle? Does he or she think the pile of bricks, mortar, wood panels and asphalt shingles is somehow it’s equal, or perhaps better. Is there a place for the natural mountain top in this line of thinking?

Unfortunately, I don’t know the answer. I do wish they would stop it, though! One thing I know is that a good architect could fit a house up there without making the neighbor want to move. More population must mean less nature. Careful consideration of where not to build leads to challenges about how we actually do. Challenges best met by an architect.

Save

Posted in Architectural Criticism, Architecture, Culture, Design, Hire an architect., Residential Design | Tagged green building, McMansion, sustainability, sustainable design, timeless standards, vernacular architecture, where not to build | Leave a Comment »

Very Frank Lloyd Wright?

November 1, 2016

Recently a reader ask for my opinion on a project. We shared numerous images, had email discussions and a phone call. I think we opened several design possibilities worth a discussion here. Follow along with the discussion and add your “two cents” in the comments section. Maybe someone out there has even better ideas than those offered here.

: Existing House

Existing House – The reader was planning a complete remodel of an existing “Mid Century Modern” house. He sent me images of the existing house, some renderings of what he was planning to do, as well as a really great original booklet with plans of similar house designs from the same historic period which can be found here.

: Design proposed by reader.

Reader’s Question – His initial question was about the windows. He sent me the proposed design shown above and asked me, in particular, what I thought about the sash windows, including decorative glass and external shutters, that are between the garage door and the chimney in the image. He also asked me for comments on the use of color. I sometimes think that clients need a hook; a way of tacitly enjoining a larger critique. Clearly, I couldn’t begin to think about details like window styles without first examining their context, which in this case involved a two part observation. I thought, “this design is very Frank Lloyd Wright, and it is actually quite nicely done.”

Save

Frank Lloyd Wright: Mid Century Modernist? – The crux of my observation about Wright is in the question about whether or not he can be grouped with the “Mid Century Modernists.” The answer is that it is done all the time, but Wright was more. He was an influencer with deep roots in the historic transition from the Victorian to Modern world. Evidence of this transition can be seen especially in his early work and it is important to this discussion because the design proposed by the reader evokes this link which, I think, justifies the design and provides an answer to his question about the windows.

The Design Process – Before I go into examples, (if you are bored by theories just skip this paragraph) I should offer a disclaimer about the design process in general. Most, if not all, design is a product of selected influences found in the greater environment in which it appears. In short, ideas do not occur in a vacuum. This is not to imply that we remember the source of these inclinations. It only means that we somehow carry various visual impressions around in our psyche and pull them out when needed. This is true with large stylistic movements that show up in the built environment, and especially when considering an architect as well thought of, and with such far reaching influence as had Frank Lloyd Wright. I am pretty sure the reader who designed this remodel gave little thought to the source of his ideas, and, when he finally decide to look, came up with the previously mentioned booklet; providing an example of how the “Modern Movement in Architecture,” which had originated with Wright and others, manifested in commercial track housing looking exactly like the house that the reader was proposing to fix. This was interesting for sure, but of little relevance in view of the proposed design which was good on it’s own merit not a little because it was specifically suggestive of Wright’s early work, whether the reader knew it or not.

Citing the Evidence – I did some research and came up with these examples. They go a long way towards explaining why I thought the readers design was “very” Frank Lloyd Wright. I picked them because they contained elements in common with the proposed design as noted below each image.

: The Lake Forest house, like our existing example, has a shallow roof pitch and is the only one in the group with a typically “modern vibe.” Not to be overlooked is the massing which is a contrast of strong horizontal and vertical volumes – also in our example design, and large expanses of glass.

: The Oakpark house still looks Victorian but Wright assimilates the half timberd facade at the gable with his signature modern massing, both of which are present in the readers design.

: The casement windows in the Oakpark house feature regular rectangular divisions which might suggest a solution to the window problem posed by the reader.

: Robie House provides a great example of how Wright used decorative glass in a highly stylized manner which was completely coordinated and related to the interior design as part of the building as a cohesive piece of art. This suggests that unless such a level of design can be achieved it would be best for the reader to stick with a more regular approach and revise the windows shown in the proposed design.

: FLW’s house and studio, like much of his work, demonstrates more modern volumetric massing but otherwise maintains a link with Victorian origins. The classical windows with Tudor style diamond glass suggest a viable solution to the readers window problem.

: Finally this Oakpark house, although mostly Victorain except for the massing, has simple offset geometry on the glass, which may provide the best solution for the reader’s window design problem so far.

Save

Suggested Revision

Possible Solution – Just to restate the problem – in case you forgot already – the reader asked me to comment on the two sets of sash windows with the decorative glass and external shutters that are shown in his proposed design. Based on the research, and assuming the reader intended to install in the existing openings, I recommended that casement windows be used instead of sash, which are almost never used by Wright and generally not strongly evident in “Mid Century Modern” houses from this era. I further suggested that a simple geometric muntin pattern offset from the mullions like those in the last research example above would work. The reader did not ask me about the garage door, nevertheless I suggested he change it to a simple door with horizontal divisions which I thought worked better than the existing which had fielded panels and “colonial” references.

Artwork by Reader

Let’s Not Forget the Color – Finally the reader sent me this fun bit of artwork and ask me what I thought of the color. The greenish color of the existing tile roof seems unique to this house and, I think, adds personality. The rest of the natural colored materials are working and support the new design. Trim and the garage door are best colored to disappear. Check out Wright’s Studio above. Continuing a bit of green might be used to attract attention to the front door but it is not really necessary.

Special thanks to Angelo Corriea, a builder from our Northern neighbor, who sent me this project, but really didn’t need my help as he created a nice design on his own. Also, for you serious students of design, it might be worth checking out the connections between Frank Lloyd Wright, Henry Hobson Richardson, and Louis Sullivan.

Bridget Gaddis, is a Licensed Architect and LEED-accredited Professional practicing nationally, and locally in the Washington DC area. She holds professional degrees in both Architecture and Interior Design, and with a comprehensive background in commercial retail design, planning and construction has completed projects for such for such well known brands as Chloe, Zegna, and Bvlgari. Her career began in tenant coordination and site planning for two well-known Cleveland developers, followed by six years in store planning for a national retailer. After a move to New York City in 1997, she spent the next years working for architecture firms specializing in retail projects. In 2011 she started her own practice in Alexandria, VA. Ms. Gaddis is the author of two blogs dealing with architectural subjects.

Save

Posted in Architectural Criticism, Architecture, Art, Culture, Design, Hire an architect., Residential Design | Tagged architectural theory, curb appeal, design ideas, finishes, Frank Lloyd Wright, modern architecture, modernist, remodeling | Leave a Comment »

Vertical Siding Makes a House Look “Modern”

August 3, 2016

If I told you that these two houses were essentially the same house, what would you think? Would you say “no way!” They don’t look anything alike. One is quite pretty and contemporary. The other is dated and very ordinary. Anyone can see that they are very different.

Are they not stick built boxes with low pitched roofs and asymmetrical street elevations? Do they not have two stories with horizontal siding on the upper level and garrison style colonial shapes? Are they not about the same size and maybe even construction quality? Are they not basically the same?

What makes them look so different? Why does the green house appear modern and relevant and the blue one look like a 1965 colonial tract house that has seen better days. The answer is more simple than one might think, which is encouraging because it means that there is a fix. It is about the finishes. Before going there, let me say that I have no idea about the origin or remodeling history of these two houses. Whether the finishes are newly added or original matters not at all, as it is about the materials that were used and how they were applied.

If we make a single list of materials that are different on the street elevation of both of these houses we end up with some vertical siding, white shutters and paint. Really, that’s all! Can such a small kit of parts be applied with such divergent results? The answer, of course, is yes. Consider, for the sake of discussion, what would happen to the blue house if we threw out the shutters, added a contrasting color to the “pop out” dormer and and reversed the first floor siding so that it was vertical instead of horizontal. Anyone brave enough to undertake it, could end up with an amazing update.

Oversimplification? Perhaps! It does, though, drive home the main reason for this discussion, which is that vertical siding makes a house look modern. Most architects will say, when used with care, it confers a stylistically modern persona and reinforces an up to date image.

Save

Posted in Architectural Criticism, Architecture, Design, Hire an architect., Residential Design | Tagged colonial houses, curb appeal, design ideas, finishes, home owners, modern architecture, modernist, remodeling | 2 Comments »

Happily Ignoring the Open Plan

June 30, 2016

Visual elements are important to consumers, often to the exclusion of everything else. Does this seem like a reasonable statement to you? “No,” you say? “I check ‘Consumer Report,’ read reviews, make list of features, produce spread sheets comparing quality and cost. I’m the definition of an informed buyer!” Really? Tell that to the car salesmen as you pass up the best deal on the lot because the color doesn’t suit.

There are, of course, in the world of residential architecture, multifarious examples of this behavior, most yielding irksome consequences. Consider, for example, the unavoidable appeal created by the drama of a two story room, the particular bane of social interaction, intimate conversation, and acoustic excellence, not to mention disappearing light, receding walls and ceilings that appear grey no matter what their actual color.

Well okay, maybe I exaggerated a bit, although most of these homes are finished in drywall with nothing else to moderate the effects.

Anyone looking for verification has only to observe the behavior of party goers in such an environment. I stopped counting the times I have found all of the guest crowded into the low ceiling kitchen, happily ignoring the open plan to avoid the soaring space. I try to warn clients, telling them that what looks good does not always feel/function the same. They always go for the looks anyway.

Save

Posted in Architectural Criticism, Architecture, Design, Hire an architect., Residential Design | Tagged design ideas, human scale, kitchen design, open above, open concept | 4 Comments »

What’s in a name?

May 18, 2016

: Some appreciate this,

: or long for this.

: Some remember this,

: or even this,

: more likely this.

: A few appreciate this.

: Many hope for this.

: A lot can afford this,

: or this,

: and live in this.

: Most end up with this.

: The lucky ones end up with this.

Name Dropping – Did you ever notice that real estate people like to insert the names of house styles into their conversations with potential buyers? “…nice to meet you. I have a move in ready Center Hall Colonial to show tomorrow.” or “…there is a Mid-Century Modern neighborhood that generates a lot of interest.” The local historical committee, of course, has raised name dropping to an art form. Here in Old Town they are the designated authority, champion and voice of all things Georgian and very present at all meetings of the local architectural review board.

Name Listing – There is a list of house styles on Wikipedia with which, truth be told, I have a lot of fun. I can’t wait to tell some realtor that I would like to see a Dingbat house? No kidding. It really exists! It is also possible to get creative and customize these terms. I actually thought of this a few years ago when a potential client brought a fist full of photos to a meeting. She repeatedly told me how much she like Regency style design. The photos were of mirrored replicas made into furniture and finishes of what appeared to be every decorative cliche ever invented by Thomas Sheraton, all of it originating from some shop like Pier One. What, I thought, would one call these? We could say Meta Modern or Pseudo Modern ( I will let you look those up) which seem to be buzz words that include all things previous. How about Post Modern Revival of Regency Revival? That ought to cover it. I think putting things into categories gives us a feeling of control. Although not much in the way of actual control.

Name Cancelling – Does not even the lowest budget shopper have a vision or image relating to his or her expectations about where they hope to live? Think cottage and white picket fence a là now deceased American Dream. What guides this? I don’t think it has anything to do with style, named or real, unless that style somehow fits into the larger world of the individual’s past residential experience, turned into a dream or not. Anyone looking to define a future stylistic paradigm might do well to flush out what is common in places we have lived in the recent past. No easy task in an increasingly small and populated world and further complicated by the manipulations of large scale planners defining a built environment according to their particular terms.

Name Hunting – I have a friend, raised in an urban apartment block, these days sporting a million plus house budget in a quaint suburban neighborhood and hard pressed to find an acceptable house. She has been conditioned to think of a house as a commodity, with stylistic taste leaning towards the McMansion, she will consider only new construction and is completely put off by a yard of any size. Her ideas about security and building in general are still involved with her roots in the apartment block. As a member of a larger similarly inclined shopping group, she is influencing the look of a neighborhood because developers do very good market research. They understand and deliver the absolute minimum that must be provided in order to satisfy this customer. Expanding a customer’s horizons is only part of the program to the extent necessary to sell a newly built home. More complex, better assimilated options are never offered and existing housing is mostly ignored.

Name Finding – The word “finding” may be a little misleading (it fit in the text). It is more as if a new style, rather than directly resulting from the search, just appears, although the looking is still required, and I might add, is considered to be a high intellectual activity in the world of architectural scholars. It is the result of a dialectical process, where the tension between the dominant old style and the emerging newer style become so great that the whole conflict collapses into something else. It is like the invisible whole, which is greater than the sum of the parts, suddenly becomes visible and Voila, a new style is there. This line of thinking, of course, comes from the German philosopher Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel, a favorite of mine, distained by many, and begging the question, what is the emerging new style? Is it already implemented? Will it be defined by the spatial needs of an expanding population or the desire to be “green?” Will it return to nature like a Hogan, or the earth like a Sod House. Maybe it will look like my favorite Parkitecture! Could we see a Modern Farmhouse, or how about a Star Wars version of the Rumah Gadang? That might work. Whatever the new name, I am pretty sure that some combination of its elements will be easy to locate in the afore mentioned list of house styles!

Images are used under Creative Commons from Flickr and Wikipedia or owned by the author. Please contact us for the links.

Posted in Architectural Criticism, Architecture, Art, Culture, Design, Hire an architect., Residential Design | Tagged architectural theory, dead architects, design ideas, home owners, McMansion, modern architecture, modernist, Post Modern Architecture, primitive hut, sustainability, sustainable design, vernacular architecture | Leave a Comment »

Real people don't hire architects…?

Archive for the ‘Residential Design’ Category

Accidentally Modern

The feel good factor of unbridled color.

Making a Case for Anomalies

Simple Architecture: a place for the eye to rest?

Hugh Newell Jacobsen

Good Question

Common Simplicity

“… three, two, one, lift off house.”

The seen can also see.

Very Frank Lloyd Wright?

Vertical Siding Makes a House Look “Modern”

Happily Ignoring the Open Plan

What’s in a name?

Why & Where

Email Subscription

Categories

Archives