I really wonder if I missed some important rule of architecture when I was in school, or maybe there is something in the building code, some new requirement, or could it be something in the culture, or maybe technology? That’s it, they must be functional? I doubt it though. Not anymore.
What does that leave? Is it honestly possible that consumer preference has demanded that every mediocre house built in the US since 1950 must have at least one set of shutters, functional or mostly not, on a window that is visible from the street? Sometimes it seems that way.
Do you want to know something about shutters, about function, types, sizes, history? It is stuff I am not going to talk about here because it has already been done, many, many times, so check out the Old House Guy. Shutters, we are told, are a great way to beautify a home because they provide lots of visual impact for not much cost. They can also, he continues, very easily ruin (and usually do) its entire appearance, a point with which I wholeheartedly agree.
Not so you say? Look at this cute little house. Think how it would look without the bright shutters and notice how nicely they are tied in by the use of equally bright accents at the door. Bye the way, the variegated roof doesn’t hurt either.
What about this house? These shutters are adding design to an otherwise very ordinary house. They set up visual rhythm, add order and interest. I want to go inside and find all of the windows equally spaced and lined up in the same room.
The problem is that for every thoughtful application of shutters there are 50 that miss, or never attempt to hit, the design mark. The materials of Mid-American single family housing, stick built in mass after the WW II, and continuing today in miles of new urbanest town houses, have remained the same. Only the planning has changed. There is a very unpleasant visual tension between the very old fashioned, historic kit of parts and the contemporary form of the whole. Nowhere is that tension more evident than in the application of decoration, the most obvious being shutters. The pervasive wood clapboarding, shingles, brick, pre-manufactured windows, doors, architectural elements and trim used everywhere today might better fit on a wing of Monticello than on a new apartment in a builder development.
This appears of little concern to much of the purchasing public, who are perhaps too uniformed to ask for better. I would suggest that visually pleasing results may be achieved when the parts support the whole, when the clapboarding becomes a horizontal element reinforcing the shape of a wide low ranch, when the a decorative element completes one side of a partially open gable, when a change of finish material turns a short window into a vertical element, maybe even when a shutter signals a message. Here are a few ideas offered as inspiration in my effort to de-shutter our world.
Images in bottom gallery are from http://www.flickr.com and used under creative commons. Please contact us for links.